They have earned the ire of NRL coaches but leading players say recent adjustments to the two-referees system has made little difference on the field.<br><br>Sydney Roosters coach Brian Smith launched a scathing attack on the new model following his side’s 34-18 loss to Newcastle on Saturday night, claiming that relying too heavily on one dominant referee was slowing the game down and causing more errors to be made.<br><br>“The game was just butt-ugly from start to finish,” Smith said. “I'd like to know if we're going to keep going with this ridiculous use of two referees.<br><br>“Gavin Badger has been a terrific referee for a long time, he's been around for ages, but he's slower than me. And he benefited more by the use of two referees. <br><br>“Why are we going back to one referee doing all the leg work and one guy out the back making no decisions?”<br><br>But players contacted by NRL.com have rebuffed Smith’s claims, insisting the change has had little impact – and in some cases has even improved the standard of refereeing.<br><br>“To be honest, I haven’t noticed any real difference,” Warriors centre Brent Tate said.<br><br>“There are still a few grey areas that haven’t really been addressed but in terms of the speed of the game I don’t think it’s any different at all.”<br><br>The NRL implemented a new two-referees system for the first time last season, aimed at reducing the workload previously placed on a single referee.<br><br>However, the system was overhauled four weeks ago following a series of embarrassing on-field gaffes – the most glaring coming when Parramatta captain Nathan Cayless was wrongly sin-binned by Ben Cummins and Gerard Sutton in a fiery clash against South Sydney in Round 6.<br><br>Referees boss Robert Finch responded by appointing a dominant referee in matches where a senior and junior referee were paired up, with the influence of the junior referee greatly reduced. <br><br>And although the move hasn’t gone over well with everyone, and in particular Smith, the players seem to think otherwise.<br><br>Titans back-rower Anthony Laffranchi said that having a dominant referee has made it easier for players to understand interpretations.<br><br>“I think the change was for the better,” he said. <br><br>“It has provided more consistency of interpretation throughout the match with a dominant referee there. <br><br>“In my opinion the game is actually flowing better now.”<br><br>Raiders forward Tom Learoyd-Lahrs admitted he wasn’t even sure whether his side had been refereed by a dominant referee since the system was altered four weeks ago.<br><br>“That goes to show what a difference I think it’s made,” he said. “I mean, I noticed a big difference when they introduced two referees last year because with two there they definitely police the ruck a lot better, but I haven’t noticed any real change the past few weeks.<br><br>“I remember watching one of the first games they had with Tony Archer as the dominant referee and everyone seemed to think he did a good job.<br><br>“It’s probably a bit strange to have some games with two referees and others with a dominant referee but if that’s what they’ve got to do for a while to get it right, then I’ve got no problem with it.”<br><br>However, whether the two-referees experiment lasts beyond this season could well remain open to debate.<br><br>Perhaps a return to a single on-field referee could still be on the cards?<br><br>“I wouldn’t be surprised if one referee comes back into favour again, given the way the game has improved the past few weeks,” Laffranchi said.<br>
You have skipped the navigation, tab for page content
National Rugby League respects and honours the Traditional Custodians of the land and pay our respects to their Elders past, present and future. We acknowledge the stories, traditions and living cultures of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples on the lands we meet, gather and play on.